Possibly, but it depends on the CSPA calculation, not on the filing date alone. The child's age is reduced by the time the petition was pending, and the result must be under 21 when a visa becomes available and the child seeks it within a year.
What usually goes wrong
The common error is treating the filing date as the date that freezes a child's age. Hypothetical example: a Lévis engineering manager files an EB-5 petition when his daughter is twenty. The petition is pending for a period; under the Child Status Protection Act, that pending time is subtracted from her age when a visa number becomes available.
If the adjusted age is under 21 and she pursues the visa within the required year, she keeps derivative eligibility. If visa availability for the family's category and country is delayed long after approval, the subtraction may not be enough. Ask counsel to run the calculation with the current Visa Bulletin before filing, and consider what independent route she would use if she ages out.
Do not enrol her in a U.S. programme on the assumption that residence will come in time; her study status, if needed, is a separate application.